The U.S. Supreme Court has temporarily reinstated a federal anti-money laundering law while a legal challenge continues in a lower court.

The court’s emergency stay lifts an injunction issued by a federal judge that had blocked the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), which requires many business entities to disclose ownership details. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the lone dissenter in the decision.

The U.S. Department of Justice had recently requested the Supreme Court’s intervention, and the ruling came shortly after a new administration took office. The CTA, enacted in early 2021 as part of an annual defense bill, mandates that small business owners submit personal information, such as birth dates and addresses, to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network to aid in combating financial crimes.

The legal dispute has drawn attention from business groups and regulatory reform advocates, some of whom seek to delay the law’s implementation. The case will now return to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, where the Justice Department will defend the law as a valid exercise of congressional authority over interstate commerce. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court’s decision allows officials to move forward with enforcing the disclosure requirements.

Justice Jackson, in her dissent, argued that the government had not shown sufficient urgency to justify intervention. She noted that the law’s enforcement had already been delayed for nearly four years and questioned whether further postponement would cause significant harm.

The Justice Department contends that delaying the law’s implementation would impede efforts to combat financial crimes and affect national security. Former Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar emphasized in the government’s application that postponement would disrupt ongoing enforcement efforts and international cooperation on anti-money laundering measures.

The Supreme Court also declined an alternative proposal to take up a broader issue regarding the authority of federal judges to block laws nationwide. Justice Neil Gorsuch expressed interest in addressing this topic in the future, noting that such injunctions have become a common legal tool.

Related Posts

My 18th Birthday Surprises for My Stepmom Turned Her World Upside Down

Sarah’s 18th birthday was a day she’ll never forget, not only because it marked her official passage into adulthood, but also because she planned to disclose a…

The beloved star has died, leaving the world in shock. Fans from all over have gathered to say their final goodbyes.

The adored actor Bruce Willis, well known for his parts in classic movies, is winning over his fans’ hearts all over again. This time, it’s via a…

My MIL Made Me Sleep on the Garage Floor After My Husband Died – She Didn’t Expect to Beg for My Help a Month Later

I used to believe love could protect me from anything. That no matter what life threw our way, my husband, James, would always be there to catch…

My Husband Insisted on Hiring a Cute Young Nanny While I Was on a Business Trip — He Didn’t Know I Had Installed Surveillance Cameras

My Husband Insisted on Hiring a Cute Young Nanny While I Was on a Business Trip — He Didn’t Know I Had Installed Surveillance Cameras Leaving my…

Kash Patel Unleashes J6 Documents That Could “Blow Up” the Pipe Bomb Hoax

In a bold, unprecedented move that is sending shockwaves throughout Washington, FBI Director Kash Patel has ordered the release of hundreds of documents related to the agency’s…

A Birthday Gift Gone Wrong

A Birthday Gift Gone Wrong My husband gave me a shower gel for my birthday. I didn’t show it to him, but I got really offended, because…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *